Proof · Tested on the past · For LyondellBasell

In 1978, the data already knew which catalyst would make the world’s polypropylene

The data picked the supported catalyst in 1978. Sixteen years later, the European Commission found even Europe’s old plants running on it.

Polypropylene, the plastic in bottle caps and car bumpers, is made with a catalyst that links propylene gas into long chains. The TiCl₃ catalyst, used since the 1950s, made so little plastic per gram that plants had to wash it out of the product. The supported catalyst spreads the titanium thinly over magnesium chloride, so far more of it does useful work. For each we measured how much better per dollar it got every year, using only the patents that existed at the time.

Computed from patents published by each date · nothing here is hindsight
01 · The reading

How fast each catalyst improved

% better per dollar each year. Readings every two years. The signal came four years before Spheripol.

1
1982
Spheripol launched
2
1983
Hercules joins Montedison in Himont
3
1985
Rival plant at full scale
4
1994
European Commission decision
Improvement rate: yearly gain in performance per dollar, read from patent citation networks. Sets, polypropylene catalysts only: supported catalyst (titanium on magnesium chloride) 1,269 families, TiCl₃ catalyst 365.
1.3×
How much faster the supported catalyst was improving in 1978 · 27% a year against 21
7 years
From the signal to the rival Union Carbide and Shell plant at full scale
02 · In the plant

More plastic from every gram, and fewer plant sections

What the data showed.

In 1978 the supported catalyst was improving 1.3 times as fast as the TiCl₃ catalyst, 27% a year against 21. The gap widened to 1.9 times by 1984, and the TiCl₃ catalyst did not catch up for four decades.

What that meant in the plant.

Each gram of supported catalyst made several times more plastic, nearly all of it the hard, useful kind. So a plant could drop the sections that washed out catalyst and removed the soft, sticky part. Spheripol, launched in 1982, was built that way.

In the plantTiCl₃Supported
Plastic per gram of catalystLittleSeveral times more
Catalyst wash-out sectionNeededDropped
Removing the soft, sticky partNeededDropped
Fewer plant sectionsSpheripol, 1982
03 · Then the market caught up

Four years from the signal to Spheripol

1978

Our data: the supported catalyst improving faster than the TiCl₃ catalyst.

Signal
1982

Montedison launches Spheripol, a process built around the supported catalyst.

+4 yrs
1983

Hercules, the first US polypropylene maker, joins Montedison in Himont to use its new process.

+5 yrs
1985

Rival Union Carbide and Shell run their first full-scale plant, in Seadrift, Texas.

+7 yrs
1994

The European Commission finds Spheripol the most licensed process, and Europe’s old plants on high-yield catalysts.

+16 yrs
2011

LyondellBasell’s annual report calls Spheripol the most widely used polypropylene process.

+33 yrs
04 · What a 1978 reading would have been worth

The window to design a plant around the catalyst and license it

It would not have said which plant design would win, or who would license it. It would have said the polypropylene plant of the future would be built around the supported catalyst, four years before Spheripol was launched.

For a process licensor, that is the window to design a plant around the catalyst and license it. Montedison did both, and Spheripol became the most widely licensed process in the world.

4 years
From the signal to the launch of Spheripol
1.9×
The supported catalyst’s lead by 1984, held for four decades

The same reading works for the next call: which plastic recycling route earns the scale-up beyond Wesseling.

The method, in one minute

What is TIR?

TIR — the Technology Improvement Rate — measures how fast a technology gets better each year, computed from global patent data. Not who is filing, or how much: how fast the route is actually moving. Historically, the fastest-improving technology always wins.

Signal 1 · Cycle time
How many years between one generation of inventions and the next.
Shorter cycles = faster progress toward newer generations.
Signal 2 · Knowledge flow
How much each new generation is cited by later innovations.
More citations = bigger, more important step forward.
One number
Together they give a single, objective measure of speed — taking the guesswork (and politics) out of R&D bets.
Read more about the method →
Methodology co-developed with MIT — 30 years of peer-reviewed research.

Provenance. Every patent carries a publication date, so the record can be replayed: every improvement rate on this page uses only the patents that were published at the time. Chart data: GetFocus platform exports, October 2026.

Sources
  1. Basell Spheripol history
  2. Piemontesi and Morini, 2003
  3. Plastics Technology, 2005
  4. Encyclopedia.com (Hercules)
  5. BIC Magazine (Seadrift)
  6. EC Decision 94/811/EC, 1994
  7. LyondellBasell 10-K, fiscal 2010
Your next reading

Bring us the choice you are weighing now

Bring us one live technology decision. Within 48 hours you get a free preliminary Decision Brief: a first-pass radar, improvement rates and suggested triggers.

Free · 48 hours · preliminary scoping. Validated radars come with a subscription