Proof · Tested on the past · For Henkel

In 1992, the data already knew what would replace EVA in case and carton sealing

The data picked polyolefin in 1992. Technomelt Supra went on sale nine years later.

Since the 1960s, packaging hot melts had been built on EVA. In the early 1990s, new single-site catalysts gave adhesive makers a second option: a polyolefin base. For each one we measured how much better per dollar it got each year, using only the patents that existed at the time.

Computed from patents public at each date · nothing here is hindsight
01 · The reading

How fast each base polymer improved

% better per dollar each year. Readings every two years. The polyolefin line starts at its first reading, 1992: the first polyolefin hot melt patent was filed in 1989.

1
1998
First polyolefin case sealer on sale
2
2001
Henkel launches Technomelt Supra
3
2004
Dow launches AFFINITY GA
4
2012
Technomelt Supra 1000
5
2021
Technomelt Supra ECO
Scope: packaging hot melts, premium tier; EVA kept the low-cost tier. Sets: polyolefin hot melt (single-site catalysed base) 241 families, EVA hot melt 574.
2.2×
2.2 times as fast as EVA in 1992 · 32% a year against 15
30 years
Polyolefin ahead of EVA at every reading since 1992
02 · On the packaging line

Polyolefin stayed ahead at every reading since

What the data showed.

In 1992 polyolefin hot melts were getting about 32% better per dollar every year, EVA about 15%. Polyolefin stayed ahead at every reading since.

What that meant on the packaging line.

The new base kept its bond when boxes got hot or cold, holding at 90 to 93°C where EVA let go at 70 to 75°C. It also stayed cleaner in the melt tank and could run at lower temperatures. Henkel lists the same gains for Supra today: far more thermally stable, and up to 30% less adhesive.

Heat resistance · bond holds up to
Polyolefin hot melt90–93°C
EVA hot melt70–75°C
Far more thermally stableCleaner melt tankUp to 30% less adhesive
03 · Then the market caught up

Nine years from the signal to Technomelt Supra

1992

Our data: polyolefin improving twice as fast as EVA.

Signal
1998

The first polyolefin case-sealing hot melt goes on sale, H.B. Fuller’s Advantra.

+6 yrs
2001

Henkel launches Technomelt Supra, built “to replace hot melts based on EVA”.

+9 yrs
2004

Dow launches AFFINITY GA, the first polymers made for hot melts.

+12 yrs
2012

Technomelt Supra 1000: up to 40% less adhesive than EVA hot melts.

+20 yrs
2021

Technomelt Supra ECO: up to 98% bio-based, on a Dow polymer.

+29 yrs
04 · What a 1992 reading would have been worth

The reading pointed there in 1992

It would not have said which formulation to launch, or that EVA would keep the low-cost end of the market. It would have said the next premium case-sealing adhesive would sit on a polyolefin base, nine years before Technomelt Supra went on sale.

For the world’s largest adhesive maker, that was time to choose a polymer partner and have Supra ready before the first polyolefin case sealer reached the market in 1998. Henkel calls Supra “a milestone in our 150-year company history”. The reading showed where that milestone lay, nine years early.

17 points
Polyolefin's lead over EVA in 2000
1.4 points
Its lead now

Polyolefin still leads, but by 1.4 points, down from 17 in 2000. The same reading works for the choices in front of you now, from bio-based polymers to packs made for paper recycling.

The method, in one minute

What is TIR?

TIR — the Technology Improvement Rate — measures how fast a technology gets better each year, computed from global patent data. Not who is filing, or how much: how fast the route is actually moving. Historically, the fastest-improving technology always wins.

Signal 1 · Cycle time
How many years between one generation of inventions and the next.
Shorter cycles = faster progress toward newer generations.
Signal 2 · Knowledge flow
How much each new generation is cited by later innovations.
More citations = bigger, more important step forward.
One number
Together they give a single, objective measure of speed — taking the guesswork (and politics) out of R&D bets.
Read more about the method →
Methodology co-developed with MIT — 30 years of peer-reviewed research.

Provenance. Every patent carries a filing date, so the record can be replayed: every improvement rate on this page uses only the patents that were public at the time. Chart data: GetFocus platform exports, October 2026. The polyolefin vs EVA reading is a property of the two technologies, not of any one company: the same 1992 signal appears in every account’s backtest. What differs is how each company acted on it.

Sources
  1. US 6,207,748 (ExxonMobil, 1989)
  2. Packmedia, 2018
  3. Henkel, 21 Jan 2026 and 11 Feb 2021
  4. Dow, 8 Jul 2004
  5. Labels & Labeling, 11 Jun 2012
  6. Chemical Online, 19 Sep 2000
Your next reading

Run the same reading on the choices in front of you now

Bring us one live technology decision. Within 48 hours you get a free preliminary Decision Brief: a first-pass radar, improvement rates and suggested triggers.

Free · 48 hours · preliminary scoping. Validated radars come with a subscription