Proof · Tested on the past · For Airbus

In 2000, the data already knew which battery would keep a satellite alive through the dark

The data picked lithium-ion in 2000. Four years later, Airbus built the first geostationary satellite to fly on it.

A satellite runs on sunlight, and on a battery whenever it passes into Earth’s shadow. Nickel-cadmium was the first rechargeable satellite battery. Nickel-hydrogen, nickel paired with hydrogen gas in a sealed steel vessel, lasted longer and became the standard. Lithium-ion is the chemistry in phones and laptops, adapted for space. For each one we measured how much better per dollar it got each year, using only the patents published at the time.

Computed from patents published by each date · nothing here is hindsight
01 · The reading

How fast each battery improved

% better per dollar each year. Readings every two years. The lithium-ion line starts in 2000: its first space patents appear in 1999.

1
2001
Proba-1, first lithium-ion battery in space
2
2004
Eutelsat W3A, first geostationary satellite on lithium-ion, built by Astrium (now Airbus)
3
2006
Boeing orders lithium-ion for two satellites
4
2019
ESA says lithium-ion has replaced every earlier battery in space
Patents written for batteries on satellites and other spacecraft, read with only the patents published by each year.
1.8×
Lithium-ion against nickel-hydrogen in 2000 · 41% a year against 23
19 years
From the signal to ESA saying lithium-ion had replaced every other battery in space
02 · On the satellite

The same energy in far less mass

What the data showed.

In 2000, the first year it can be read, lithium-ion was getting about 41% better per dollar every year, nickel-hydrogen about 23%. Lithium-ion stayed ahead at every reading since. Nickel-hydrogen’s rate had been falling since the late 1980s: a battery that had done most of its improving.

What that meant on the satellite.

Lithium-ion stores the same energy in far less mass. On W3A it saved about 200 kg, mass that goes to payload or a cheaper launch. Orbital put the battery saving at 30 to 50% when it switched in 2005.

Lithium-ion · against nickel-hydrogen
Mass saved on Eutelsat W3A~200 kg
Battery mass saving, Orbital (2005)30–50%
More payloadCheaper launch
03 · Then the market caught up

Four years from the signal to the first geostationary satellite on lithium-ion

2000

Our data: lithium-ion improving about 1.8 times as fast as nickel-hydrogen.

Signal
2001

ESA’s Proba-1 flies the first lithium-ion battery in space.

+1 yr
2004

Eutelsat W3A, built by Astrium (now Airbus), is the first geostationary satellite on lithium-ion.

+4 yrs
2005

Orbital switches its communications satellites to lithium-ion.

+5 yrs
2006

Boeing orders lithium-ion batteries for two satellites.

+6 yrs
2013

Saft’s lithium-ion batteries fly on their 100th satellite.

+13 yrs
2019

ESA: lithium-ion has “entirely supplanted” earlier batteries in space.

+19 yrs
04 · What a 2000 reading would have been worth

About 200 kg back on every satellite

It would not have said which cell maker to back, or when lithium-ion would be judged safe to fly. It would have said the next satellite battery would be lithium-ion, four years before the first geostationary satellite flew on it.

For a satellite builder, that meant about 200 kg back on every satellite. Airbus moved first, and by 2019 had flown lithium-ion on more than 60 Eurostar satellites.

~200 kg
Back on every satellite
60+
Eurostar satellites flown on lithium-ion by 2019

The same reading works for the choice you are weighing now.

The method, in one minute

What is TIR?

TIR — the Technology Improvement Rate — measures how fast a technology gets better each year, computed from global patent data. Not who is filing, or how much: how fast the route is actually moving. Historically, the fastest-improving technology always wins.

Signal 1 · Cycle time
How many years between one generation of inventions and the next.
Shorter cycles = faster progress toward newer generations.
Signal 2 · Knowledge flow
How much each new generation is cited by later innovations.
More citations = bigger, more important step forward.
One number
Together they give a single, objective measure of speed — taking the guesswork (and politics) out of R&D bets.
Read more about the method →
Methodology co-developed with MIT — 30 years of peer-reviewed research.

Provenance. Every patent carries a publication date, so the record can be replayed: every improvement rate on this page uses only the patents that were published at the time. Chart data: GetFocus platform exports, October 2026.

Sources
  1. ESA
  2. Via Satellite
  3. Military & Aerospace Electronics
Your next reading

Bring us the choice you are weighing now

Bring us one live technology decision. Within 48 hours you get a free preliminary Decision Brief: a first-pass radar, improvement rates and suggested triggers.

Free · 48 hours · preliminary scoping. Validated radars come with a subscription