Signal · Where battery-grade lithium comes from Prepared for Albemarle · September 2026

The competition for your tonne is not ExxonMobil. It is the recyclers you did not mention on the call.

You submitted the Atacama permit in March for up to six trains and told the market you had evaluated dozens of extraction technologies. Europe requires 50% of lithium to be recovered from waste batteries by the end of 2027 and 80% by the end of 2031 — the recycled tonne arrives on a legal timetable. This is every source of battery-grade lithium on one chart.

Evidence base
Global patent families across 14 lithium routes — extraction and recovery
The decision
Atacama expansion · up to six trains · permit filed March 2026
The clock
EU battery law: 50% recovered by end-2027 · 80% by end-2031
The map

Fourteen sources of battery-grade lithium, measured on maturity and improvement rate.

GetFocus
The maturity split is TRL 5, the end of validation in a relevant environment; the high/low bands split on the median improvement rate of these fourteen routes. The improvement-rate axis is non-linear (30–360%/yr). Source: GetFocus lithium analysis · September 2026.
What the signal shows
The other supply 4× vs 2017
Recycling is improving four times faster than your route.
In 2017 recycling improved about twice as fast as brine. Today it is four times — the gap has widened every year. The fastest route on the whole chart is one the recyclers already run at full size.
The 2025 headline −50% since 2017
Last year's front-runner is going backwards.
Graphene-oxide composites, the 2025 front-runner, have halved since 2017 — graphene-oxide membranes are down too. They are the only two routes going down. Metal-organic frameworks doubled in the same time: of the two you were told to watch, only one held up.
Where you sit 3× since 2017
Your own route is fine — and it is the slow half of the chart.
Your aluminium sorbents keep improving, but all seven brine routes improve at close to the same speed — the choice between them barely matters. One recycling route runs your kind of sorbent inside a recycling plant: tripled since 2017. Your know-how, someone else’s feedstock.
Who holds the patents
Patent families per route — and each route’s biggest holder.
Source: GetFocus platform export · September 2026
0 1,750 3,500 5,250 7,000 LDH sorbents 6,775 top holder: Chinese Academy Of Sciences (150) Black mass processing 3,916 top holder: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (117) Hydrometallurgy 2,698 top holder: Central South University (101) Lithium-first recovery 1,609 top holder: Central South University (58) Nanofiltration 1,034 top holder: Chinese Academy Of Sciences (38) Electrochem IX 927 top holder: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (72) IX resins 780 top holder: Jiangsu Jiuwu Hi Tech Co Ltd (24) Direct cathode recycling 703 top holder: Lg Chem Ltd (38) Li-Mn sieves 674 top holder: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (38) Pyrometallurgy 489 top holder: Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd (102) MOFs 482 top holder: Chinese Academy Of Sciences (13) GO membranes 301 top holder: Chinese Academy Of Sciences (7) GO composites 261 top holder: Honeycomb Battery Co (15) Nano-LDH 237 top holder: Chinese Academy Of Sciences Cas (14)
Your LDH sorbent route is the orange bar: 6,775 families, by far the most crowded route on the chart — and the one improving at 40%/yr. The recovery routes carry fewer families but are moving three to four times faster: hydrometallurgy 2,698 at 161%/yr, lithium-first recovery 1,609 at 132%/yr. Volume and speed point in opposite directions.
For Albemarle
The Atacama capital call still looks right: your sorbent family keeps improving and no rival brine route is pulling away. The exposure is on the other side of the chart — recycled lithium and mined lithium compete for the same tonne, recycling is improving far faster, and Europe has put a date on it. The opening: the fastest-growing recycling route pulls lithium out first with selective sorbents — the chemistry you have spent ten years on.
The method, in one minute

What is TIR?

TIR — the Technology Improvement Rate — measures how fast a technology gets better each year, computed from global patent data. Not who is filing, or how much: how fast the route is actually moving. Historically, the fastest-improving technology always wins.

Signal 1 · Cycle time
How many years between one generation of inventions and the next.
Shorter cycles = faster progress toward newer generations.
Signal 2 · Knowledge flow
How much each new generation is cited by later innovations.
More citations = bigger, more important step forward.
One number
Together they give a single, objective measure of speed — taking the guesswork (and politics) out of R&D bets.
Read more about the method →
Methodology co-developed with MIT — 30 years of peer-reviewed research.
What we could look into next

Three questions this teaser opened.

01
Sorbents in a recycling plant
Who is filing on lithium-first recovery, and is any of it your chemistry?
02
The 2025 refresh
A full side-by-side against last year's report, mechanism by mechanism.
03
Sodium-ion
Stationary storage is 30% of demand. How fast is the battery that needs no lithium improving?
Pick one, or choose a new topic. We run it as a full proof of concept for you, at no cost.
A free proof of concept, on your question

The full analysis is one working session away.

All fourteen routes, the filers behind them, and the trigger set for the Atacama decision — walked through with our analysts.

GetFocus · Technology intelligence for Albemarle